Player breakdown
Ben Roethlisberger
Miami (OH) · 2004 Draft Class
6-5241 lbs1st round, 11th overallAge at Draft: 22Age: ~44
Medium25+ Total TD
Major awards: 0Heisman votes: 0NIL Contract Value: --
Watch HighlightsModel confidence
Success Probability
43%
| Year | Team | G | GS | Cmp | Att | Pass Yds | Pass TD | INT | Rush Yds | Rush TD | Total TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | PIT | 14 | 13 | 196 | 295 | 2,621 | 17 | 11 | 144 | 1 | 18 |
| 2005 | PIT | 12 | 12 | 168 | 268 | 2,385 | 17 | 9 | 69 | 3 | 20 |
| 2006 | PIT | 15 | 15 | 280 | 469 | 3,513 | 18 | 23 | 98 | 2 | 20 |
| 2007 | PIT | 15 | 15 | 264 | 404 | 3,154 | 32 | 11 | 204 | 2 | 34 |
| 2008 | PIT | 16 | 16 | 281 | 469 | 3,301 | 17 | 15 | 101 | 2 | 19 |
| 2009 | PIT | 15 | 15 | 337 | 506 | 4,328 | 26 | 12 | 82 | 2 | 28 |
| 2010 | PIT | 12 | 12 | 240 | 389 | 3,200 | 17 | 5 | 176 | 2 | 19 |
| 2011 | PIT | 15 | 15 | 324 | 513 | 4,077 | 21 | 14 | 70 | 0 | 21 |
| 2012 | PIT | 13 | 13 | 284 | 449 | 3,265 | 26 | 8 | 92 | 0 | 26 |
| 2013 | PIT | 16 | 16 | 375 | 584 | 4,261 | 28 | 14 | 99 | 1 | 29 |
| 2014 | PIT | 16 | 16 | 408 | 608 | 4,952 | 32 | 9 | 27 | 0 | 32 |
| 2015 | PIT | 12 | 11 | 319 | 469 | 3,938 | 21 | 16 | 29 | 0 | 21 |
| 2016 | PIT | 14 | 14 | 328 | 509 | 3,819 | 29 | 13 | 14 | 1 | 30 |
| 2017 | PIT | 15 | 15 | 360 | 561 | 4,251 | 28 | 14 | 47 | 0 | 28 |
| 2018 | PIT | 16 | 16 | 452 | 675 | 5,129 | 34 | 16 | 98 | 3 | 37 |
| 2019 | PIT | 2 | 2 | 35 | 62 | 351 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | PIT | 15 | 15 | 399 | 608 | 3,803 | 33 | 10 | 11 | 0 | 33 |
| 2021 | PIT | 16 | 16 | 390 | 605 | 3,740 | 22 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 23 |
| Season | Team | Conf | G | Cmp | Att | Pass Yds | Pass TD | INT | Rush Yds | Rush TD | Total TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | Miami (OH) | Mid-American | 7 | 162 | 224 | 2,235 | 18 | 0 | 126 | 1 | 19 |
Model readout
Probability, context, and base score
XGBoost Prob
43%
ML model output
Context Prob
43%
Rule-based model
Suppression Signals
0
Depth chart context
SHAP Base
0.484
Average prediction
Top Positive Factors
Physical upside: 0.96 — elite athletic ceiling+0.362
Flat acceleration — consistent but not accelerating+0.351
2,235 career receiving yards — strong volume+0.273
Top Negative Factors
319.3 career ypg — elite WR1 college production-0.322
Height-adjusted speed: 4.44s — good speed for frame-0.320
Best-season yards rank: top 62% in class — average-0.286