
Player breakdown
Anquan Boldin
Florida St. · 2003 Draft Class
6-1216 lbs2nd round, 54th overallAge at Draft: 22Age: ~45
High1000+ NFL
Major awards: 0Heisman votes: 0NIL Contract Value: --
Watch HighlightsModel confidence
Success Probability
73%
Closest matches
NFL comparables
| Year | Team | G | GS | Tgt | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Y/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | ARI | 16 | 16 | 165 | 101 | 1,377 | 13.6 | 8 | 86.1 |
| 2004 | ARI | 10 | 9 | 104 | 56 | 623 | 11.1 | 1 | 62.3 |
| 2005 | ARI | 14 | 14 | 171 | 102 | 1,402 | 13.7 | 7 | 100.1 |
| 2006 | ARI | 16 | 16 | 152 | 83 | 1,203 | 14.5 | 4 | 75.2 |
| 2007 | ARI | 12 | 11 | 99 | 71 | 853 | 12 | 9 | 71.1 |
| 2008 | ARI | 12 | 11 | 127 | 89 | 1,038 | 11.7 | 11 | 86.5 |
| 2009 | ARI | 15 | 15 | 127 | 84 | 1,024 | 12.2 | 4 | 68.3 |
| 2010 | BAL | 16 | 16 | 109 | 64 | 837 | 13.1 | 7 | 52.3 |
| 2011 | BAL | 14 | 14 | 106 | 57 | 887 | 15.6 | 3 | 63.4 |
| 2012 | BAL | 15 | 15 | 112 | 65 | 921 | 14.2 | 4 | 61.4 |
| 2013 | SFO | 16 | 16 | 129 | 85 | 1,179 | 13.9 | 7 | 73.7 |
| 2014 | SFO | 16 | 16 | 130 | 83 | 1,062 | 12.8 | 5 | 66.4 |
| 2015 | SFO | 14 | 13 | 111 | 69 | 789 | 11.4 | 4 | 56.4 |
| 2016 | DET | 16 | 16 | 95 | 67 | 584 | 8.7 | 8 | 36.5 |
| Career | 202 | 198 | 1737 | 1076 | 13,779 | 12.8 | 82 | 68.2 | |
| Season | Team | Conf | G | Rec | Yds | TD | YPR | YPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | Florida State | ACC | 12 | 41 | 664 | 6 | 16.2 | 55.3 |
| 2002 | Florida State | ACC | 14 | 65 | 1,011 | 13 | 15.6 | 72.2 |
| Career | 26 | 106 | 1,675 | 19 | 15.8 | 64.4 | ||
Model readout
Probability, context, and base score
XGBoost Prob
75%
ML model output
Context Prob
57%
Rule-based model
Suppression Signals
1
Depth chart context
SHAP Base
0.955
Average prediction
Top Positive Factors
Program WR pipeline: 19% NFL 1000-yard conversion rate+1.289
0.73 TDs/game — dominant red-zone role in college+0.229
BMI 28.5 — outside ideal range for NFL WR (216 lbs)+0.222
Top Negative Factors
+7.5 ypg vs. draft class average — below class average-0.718
Physical production synergy-0.304
Efficiency composite: 0.58 — average combined efficiency-0.212